Confianz

Etiqueta: Derecho mercantil

  • What is an indemnity in M&A and how does it protect you?

    In any sale and purchase of a company, there is one element that can save the parties from a million-dollar problem: indemnity in M&A. Sound familiar? It’s time to get it right.

    What exactly does an indemnity cover in M&A?

    Imagine this: you are about to close a deal. You have done your due diligence, but you see a possible tax lawsuit. It hasn’t materialised yet, but alarm bells are ringing. In that scenario, an indemnity clause is not a suggestion: it’s your bulletproof vest. It obligates the seller to bear the cost if that problem is triggered after closing. Without it, that potential lawsuit can become your nightmare, legally and financially.

    Indemnities apply to known risks. We are not talking about vague promises like warranties, but precise guarantees: if X happens, you pay.

    Typical examples:

    • Ongoing litigation
    • Fines for tax inspections in process
    • Outstanding labour debts

    The key is to put it in writing. Because if you know it and you don’t agree to it, you won’t be able to claim. It’s that simple. It’s that dangerous.

    Indemnities vs Civil Code

    This is where the second level of the game comes in: the Civil Code. Article 1484 states that the seller is liable for hidden defects. But beware: if the buyer knows about them, there is no longer any liability. In the M&A world, this is not always the case. That is why sandbagging clauses exist. What do they do? They allow you to claim even if you were already aware of the problem, as long as the seller has concealed it or lied about it in his statements.

    But is that legal in Spain? It depends. Some courts validate them on the grounds of contractual autonomy. Others do not, considering them contrary to mandatory rules. What is clear is this: if you don’t talk about it and don’t agree to it, you lose. This is why it is often decided to directly exclude the application of the Civil Code. But this is not a minor decision. Because in doing so, it also removes its protections. It can be a double-edged sword.

    At Confianz we evaluate each case. It’s not about filling a contract with meaningless clauses. It’s about designing an agreement that works, that holds up and that defends you. We also help to set clear limits: what risks are covered, for how long, with what economic ceiling and under what conditions. Because a poorly negotiated indemnity can be a dead letter.

    How we approach it at Confianz

    At Confianz we do not use templates. Each operation has its own edges, risks and urgencies. And indemnities are too important to improvise. Our approach:

    • We take a closer look at due diligence
    • We detect real risks, not assumed risks
    • We design clauses that make both legal and practical sense.
    • We negotiate without fear and with substance

    We know that a badly drafted clause can cost millions. And we also know that negotiations are often avoided so as not to «strain» the relationship. We say the opposite: you have to tighten it where it is needed, so that it does not break later. Moreover, we help to filter out what is reasonable. Because not everything should be covered by indemnity. They can be limited to clear cases: malice, blatant errors or known but unresolved facts. This protects the buyer, without suffocating the seller.

    That is why we say that indemnities are not small print. They are the heart of the contract. And if they are badly done, there is no turning back.

    An indemnity in M&A is not just a legal formality. It is your life insurance in a complex transaction. It may sound like a technicality, but it is not. If you are in the middle of an M&A transaction or about to enter into one, don’t jump in without it in place. A clear indemnity can save you years of litigation and headaches.

    At Confianz, we have been fine-tuning these clauses for years. Not with theory, but with practice. Real cases. Real people. Real risks. Are you buying or selling a company? Let’s talk.

  • Companies must publish their average payment period to suppliers

    Since the entry into force of the Crea y Crece Law last October 2022, many companies have a new obligation. Many companies must now publish their average supplier payment period in their annual accounts. And large companies must also include it on their website.

    This is one of the measures included in the Law for the Creation and Growth of Companies, known as the Crea y Crece Law, to fight against commercial delinquency. The objective is to give economic operators the opportunity to know the payment behavior of the companies with which they are going to have a commercial relationship. This is because late payment is a major burden for many small and medium-sized Spanish companies.

    Maximum payment periods

    As a reminder, we would like to point out that the Late Payment Act establishes a maximum payment period of 60 days for all private commercial companies and 30 days for the public administration. However, there is still no sanctioning regime for those companies and public administrations that systematically fail to comply with these deadlines.

    Which companies must publish their average payment period to suppliers

    According to the regulation, «all commercial companies shall expressly include their average supplier payment period in their annual accounts». However, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation has subsequently ruled that «only those entities that prepare the report in the standard form» must do so. In other words, SMEs and micro-companies that present abridged annual accounts will not be affected by these measures.

    Additional reporting obligations

    On the other hand, some companies have additional reporting obligations.

    • Listed companies. They must publish, both in the notes to their annual accounts and on their website, in addition to their average payment period to suppliers, the monetary volume, the number of invoices paid in a period of less than 60 days and the percentage that these represent of the total number of invoices and of the total monetary amount of their payments to suppliers.
    • Unlisted companies that do not present abridged annual accounts. They must publish the same information required of listed companies in the annual report of their annual accounts and on their web page if they have one.

    An annual list of defaulting companies will be published.

    What happens if a company fails to comply with this informative duty? For the time being, no direct sanction has been established. However, the annual publication of a list of companies that fail to comply with the payment deadlines established in the Late Payment Law is planned.

    To this end, in the coming months the Government will create and regulate by royal decree the State Observatory of Private Delinquency within the framework of the State Council of SMEs.

    In this annual report on the situation of payment terms and late payment in commercial transactions, the State Observatory of Private Delinquency will include the companies that are in the following circumstances:

    • On December 31 of the previous year the total amount of unpaid invoices exceeds 600,000€.
    • The percentage of invoices paid by the company in a period shorter than the maximum term set by the law on late payment is less than 90% of the total.
    • Companies with assets exceeding €11.4 million, with a turnover exceeding €22.8 million and with at least 250 employees.

    This report will be presented and analyzed at the State Council of SMEs.  Subsequently, the Government will send it to the Spanish Parliament and it will be published on the website of the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Tourism.